In general, radiographs made with gamma rays are considered to be what compared to those made with X-rays?

Radiographs made with gamma rays are typically considered to be inferior to those made with X-rays for several reasons rooted in the fundamental differences between the two types of radiation.

Gamma rays have higher energy than X-rays, which can lead to increased penetration through materials. However, this increased penetration can also result in a lower level of detail in the resulting radiograph. X-rays, being lower in energy, can provide sharper images with better contrast for many materials. This is especially true for detecting defects or irregularities within structures, as X-rays can reveal finer details that may be obscured by the broader penetration characteristics of gamma rays.

Additionally, the gamma-ray sources often come from radioactive isotopes, which may introduce other variables in terms of safety and handling compared to the more controlled conditions typically used with X-ray equipment. This can impact the quality and reliability of the radiographic techniques utilized in industrial settings.

In summary, while both gamma rays and X-rays have their own applications in radiography, X-rays are generally regarded as superior for producing high-quality radiographs with better detail and contrast.